Registration and Community Notification


Within the past few years, the nation has witnessed an unprecedented proliferation of sex offender–specific legislation designed to enhance community safety through increasing accountability and tightening restrictions for the individuals who have committed sex offenses. States have proposed and enacted a number of measures, including the use of electronic monitoring devices, residency restrictions, lifetime supervision, increased penalties and sanctions, and civil commitment for violent and predatory sex offenders. However, the most longstanding and far–reaching trends involving sex offender–specific legislation are the use of registration and community notification. Broadly speaking, registration requires convicted sex offenders to provide identifying information to law enforcement agencies, where it is entered into a central registry as a means of tracking these offenders. Community notification, on the other hand, is the process by which members of the public obtain information about registered sex offenders, either by accessing sex offender registries themselves or through the active dissemination of information by local law enforcement or other state officials.

The widespread adoption of registration and notification laws has been driven primarily by a series of federal proposals that have been ratified during the past decade. While not intended to be an exhaustive review, the key provisions of these laws are highlighted briefly below:

Enacted in 1994, The Jacob Wetterling Crimes Against Children and Sexually Violent Offender Registration Act essentially required all states to create and maintain registry systems that included specific identifying information about sex offenders who target children and those who commit violent sex crimes. It included provisions pertaining to collecting registry information from sex offenders upon release from incarceration, updating registry information when sex offenders change residences, and conducting routine address verifications.

Taken together, these and other policies enacted both at the state and federal levels have had, and will continue to have, a significant influence on adult and juvenile sex offender management efforts throughout the country. As interested jurisdictions strive toward establishing evidence–based policies and practices and consider their approaches to registration and notification, it will be important to explore the ways in which these legal policies have been implemented within the context of contemporary research and practice. For example, because assessment–driven case management leads to better outcomes, particularly when the intensity of interventions and strategies is commensurate with the assessed level of risk, jurisdictions should consider the implications for the ways in which registration and notification policies are developed and implemented. Finally, as discussed later in this section, the contemporary research and literature about adult and juvenile sex offenders can be instructive for jurisdictions that are considering how to address registration and notification most effectively.